As the musical half of the great Gilbert and Sullivan operetta-writing partnership, Sir Arthur Sullivan was behind some of the most memorable songs in English, but what were his secrets?
Professor David Owen Norris outlines Sullivan’s approach to writing his songs.
The transcript and downloadable versions of this part of the ‘Sullivan Song Day’ conference are available from the on the Gresham College website:
http://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/sullivan-song-day-1
Gresham College has been giving free public lectures since 1597. This tradition continues today with all of our five or so public lectures a week being made available for free download from our website.
http://www.gresham.ac.uk
source
I had never paid much attention to Arthur Sullivan before (all I knew of him was his operettas and "The Lost Chord") but I have a much greater appreciation for his music now. I'll have to listen to some of his more obscure work. Similarly I hadn't thought much of Elgar until I learned a bit about what he was going for.?
Very interesting points about the interpretation of sforzando, and crescendo/diminuendo vs. hairpins.?
As well as considering his stage music (from 1:05:56), one might also compare his large corpus of church music, different again and also little-known. Sullivan was first a church musician.
Norris I think says (at 0:17:27) "we don't really know" about the composer's pronunciation of "lute". His voice was in fact recorded on 5 October 1888 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Sullivan#Recordings), and this 72-second speech luckily contains the word "lucid", pronounced [lju-].
The second part of Norris' lecture is currently on http://vimeo.com/30844642.?
D.O.N. is amazing ^_^
Looking forward to watching this. Sounds like it will be interesting